Steve Rotheram, Metro Mayor Liverpool City Region, said:
“This is a disappointing and in some ways surprising announcement given the many months of positive local negotiations and the memorandum of understanding agreed to by all parties last August.
“Support for a second, safety-critical person on the new Merseyrail trains was agreed in principle last year. I have made it clear that I want to see a full agreement reached which delivers on that commitment, protects jobs and is in the best interests of passengers.
“Since I inherited this dispute, I have been clear that a resolution can only be reached by both sides sitting around the negotiating table. That is why I pushed for Merseyrail and the RMT to enter talks at ACAS and it is this approach, which has been delivering progress to date.
“Meaningful talks produced a negotiated agreement between the RMT and Merseyrail. RMT officials put forward proposals, relating to the role of the second on-board staff member and revisions to the current guards’ terms and conditions, as part of a package to resolve the dispute. It is not clear why these proposals are no longer acceptable to the union.
“I am still hopeful that a solution can be found. The issue was always about the need for a second, safety-critical member of staff to reassure passengers. That need has been recognised, so I do not understand why an agreement cannot now be reached, in order that everyone can look forward to the introduction of our brand new trains – owned by us, the public.
“Given that the RMT have now twice rejected proposals which they themselves have negotiated with the employer – and which would guarantee a second safety-critical person on board every train – I think it would be helpful for them to set out clearly what their position now is, as it appears the goalposts keep moving.”
Steve Rotheram, Metro Mayor Liverpool City Region, said:
“This is a disappointing and in some ways surprising announcement given the many months of positive local negotiations and the memorandum of understanding agreed to by all parties last August.
“Support for a second, safety-critical person on the new Merseyrail trains was agreed in principle last year. I have made it clear that I want to see a full agreement reached which delivers on that commitment, protects jobs and is in the best interests of passengers.
“Since I inherited this dispute, I have been clear that a resolution can only be reached by both sides sitting around the negotiating table. That is why I pushed for Merseyrail and the RMT to enter talks at ACAS and it is this approach, which has been delivering progress to date.
“Meaningful talks produced a negotiated agreement between the RMT and Merseyrail. RMT officials put forward proposals, relating to the role of the second on-board staff member and revisions to the current guards’ terms and conditions, as part of a package to resolve the dispute. It is not clear why these proposals are no longer acceptable to the union.
“I am still hopeful that a solution can be found. The issue was always about the need for a second, safety-critical member of staff to reassure passengers. That need has been recognised, so I do not understand why an agreement cannot now be reached, in order that everyone can look forward to the introduction of our brand new trains – owned by us, the public.
“Given that the RMT have now twice rejected proposals which they themselves have negotiated with the employer – and which would guarantee a second safety-critical person on board every train – I think it would be helpful for them to set out clearly what their position now is, as it appears the goalposts keep moving.”
Share this story
You might also like
Merseyrail and the RMT Union reach agreement on release of back-dated pay awards to support Guards during Coronavirus crisis
Joint statement from the Combined Authority, Merseyrail and the RMT